UAFS vs. WWU

Comparable Facts

Compare University of Arkansas Fort Smith in Fort Smith, AR with William Woods University in Fulton, MO on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

University of Arkansas Fort Smith is larger than WWU based on total student enrollment (5,496 students vs. 2,046 students).

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• University of Arkansas Fort Smith is located in Fort Smith, AR (Small City setting); William Woods University is in Fulton, MO (Distant Town setting).
• University of Arkansas Fort Smith is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. William Woods University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: University of Arkansas Fort Smith 18:1; William Woods University 16:1.

UAFS vs. WWU Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, UAFS or WWU? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at University of Arkansas Fort Smith than WWU ($11,159 vs. $27,092).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at University of Arkansas Fort Smith are 22.7% lower than at William Woods University ($10,082 vs. $13,050).
• William Woods University is 313.7% more expensive for in-state tuition than UAFS (about $23,006 more per year; $30,340.00 vs. $7,334.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 149.1% higher at WWU than at University of Arkansas Fort Smith (about $18,158 more per year; $30,340.00 vs. $12,182.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at William Woods University than at University of Arkansas Fort Smith (99% vs. 95%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by William Woods University students is 187.8% larger than aid received by University of Arkansas Fort Smith students ($22,204 vs. $7,715).

UAFS vs. WWU Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, UAFS or WWU? Typical SAT and ACT scores (midpoint estimates from the mid-50% ranges in the table above), enrolled-tester score ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between WWU and UAFS.

• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: UAFS - Required; WWU - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: WWU Dec 1, 2026.
• Enrolled freshman WWU students have a 0.01 point higher average high school GPA (3.4) than students at UAFS (3.39).
• UAFS has a higher acceptance rate (80.5%) than WWU (71%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 40.2% at UAFS vs. 23.6% at WWU.

UAFS vs. WWU Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for UAFS and WWU? Where federal data is available for both schools, the bullets below compare graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt using the same College Scorecard / IPEDS fields as the comparison table. If a metric is missing for one school, that school is noted separately.

• William Woods University's six-year graduation rate (50%) is higher than University of Arkansas Fort Smith's (23%).
• Graduates from William Woods University earn a median of about $3,600 more per year than UAFS graduates about ten years after starting college ($38,600 vs. $35,000), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, University of Arkansas Fort Smith graduates have a $7,305 lower median loan debt than WWU graduates ($14,132 vs. $21,437).
• Among borrowers, UAFS graduates have an estimated $75 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than WWU graduates ($146 vs. $221).
• More WWU graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former UAFS students, three years after graduation. (68% vs. 47%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.