School of the Art Institute of Chicago vs. UM-Flint

Comparable Facts

Compare School of the Art Institute of Chicago in Chicago, IL with University of Michigan Flint in Flint, MI on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

University of Michigan Flint is larger than School of the Art Institute of Chicago based on total student enrollment (6,529 students vs. 3,394 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• School of the Art Institute of Chicago is located in Chicago, IL (Large City setting); University of Michigan Flint is in Flint, MI (Midsize City setting).
• School of the Art Institute of Chicago is a private, non-profit 4-year institution. University of Michigan Flint is a public, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: School of the Art Institute of Chicago 10:1; University of Michigan Flint 14:1.

School of the Art Institute of Chicago vs. UM-Flint Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, School of the Art Institute of Chicago or UM-Flint? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at University of Michigan Flint than School of the Art Institute of Chicago ($7,852 vs. $55,631).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at University of Michigan Flint are 15.2% lower than at School of the Art Institute of Chicago ($14,042 vs. $16,550).
• School of the Art Institute of Chicago is 283.7% more expensive for in-state tuition than UM-Flint (about $41,716 more per year; $56,420.00 vs. $14,704.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 99.2% higher at School of the Art Institute of Chicago than at University of Michigan Flint (about $28,100 more per year; $56,420.00 vs. $28,320.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at School of the Art Institute of Chicago than at University of Michigan Flint (99% vs. 98%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by School of the Art Institute of Chicago students is 59.2% larger than aid received by University of Michigan Flint students ($20,050 vs. $12,591).

School of the Art Institute of Chicago vs. UM-Flint Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, School of the Art Institute of Chicago or UM-Flint? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between UM-Flint and School of the Art Institute of Chicago.

• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at School of the Art Institute of Chicago (1150) is 40 points higher than at UM-Flint (1110).
• Incoming School of the Art Institute of Chicago students have a 2 point higher typical ACT composite (median estimate) (23 vs. 21 at UM-Flint).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: School of the Art Institute of Chicago 1048/1260; University of Michigan Flint 970/1243.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: School of the Art Institute of Chicago 22/25; University of Michigan Flint 19/24.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: School of the Art Institute of Chicago - Test-free; UM-Flint - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: School of the Art Institute of Chicago Nov 15, 2026; UM-Flint Aug 22, 2027.
• Accepted freshman UM-Flint students have a 0.03 point higher average high school GPA (3.54) than students at School of the Art Institute of Chicago (3.51).
• School of the Art Institute of Chicago has a higher acceptance rate (77.5%) than UM-Flint (70.5%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 11.8% at School of the Art Institute of Chicago vs. 6.6% at UM-Flint.

School of the Art Institute of Chicago vs. UM-Flint Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for School of the Art Institute of Chicago and UM-Flint? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• School of the Art Institute of Chicago's six-year graduation rate (60%) is higher than University of Michigan Flint's (37%).
• Graduates from University of Michigan Flint earn a median of about $3,400 more per year than School of the Art Institute of Chicago graduates about ten years after starting college ($42,500 vs. $39,100), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, School of the Art Institute of Chicago graduates have a $1,287 lower median loan debt than UM-Flint graduates ($25,713 vs. $27,000).
• Among borrowers, School of the Art Institute of Chicago graduates have an estimated $14 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than UM-Flint graduates ($265 vs. $279).
• More School of the Art Institute of Chicago graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former UM-Flint students, three years after graduation. (62% vs. 40%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.