Mount Mercy College vs. WWU

Comparable Facts

Compare Mount Mercy University in Cedar Rapids, IA with William Woods University in Fulton, MO on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

William Woods University is larger than Mount Mercy College based on total student enrollment (2,046 students vs. 1,417 students).

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Mount Mercy University is located in Cedar Rapids, IA (Midsize City setting); William Woods University is in Fulton, MO (Distant Town setting).
• Mount Mercy University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution. William Woods University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Mount Mercy University 14:1; William Woods University 16:1.

Mount Mercy College vs. WWU Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Mount Mercy College or WWU? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Mount Mercy University than WWU ($24,347 vs. $27,092).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Mount Mercy University are 11.1% lower than at William Woods University ($11,600 vs. $13,050).
• Mount Mercy University is 34.7% more expensive for in-state tuition than WWU (about $10,538 more per year; $40,878.00 vs. $30,340.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 34.7% higher at Mount Mercy College than at William Woods University (about $10,538 more per year; $40,878.00 vs. $30,340.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Mount Mercy University than at William Woods University (100% vs. 99%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Mount Mercy University students is 38.4% larger than aid received by William Woods University students ($30,735 vs. $22,204).

Mount Mercy College vs. WWU Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Mount Mercy College or WWU? Typical SAT and ACT scores (midpoint estimates from the mid-50% ranges in the table above), enrolled-tester score ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between WWU and Mount Mercy College.

• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Mount Mercy College - Test optional; WWU - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: Mount Mercy College Aug 15, 2027; WWU Dec 1, 2026.
• Enrolled freshman Mount Mercy College students have a 0.1 point higher average high school GPA (3.5) than students at WWU (3.4).
• Mount Mercy College has a higher acceptance rate (82.5%) than WWU (71%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 27.9% at Mount Mercy College vs. 23.6% at WWU.

Mount Mercy College vs. WWU Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Mount Mercy College and WWU? Where federal data is available for both schools, the bullets below compare graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt using the same College Scorecard / IPEDS fields as the comparison table. If a metric is missing for one school, that school is noted separately.

• Mount Mercy University's six-year graduation rate (60%) is higher than William Woods University's (50%).
• Graduates from Mount Mercy University earn a median of about $7,300 more per year than WWU graduates about ten years after starting college ($45,900 vs. $38,600), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, William Woods University graduates have a $813 lower median loan debt than Mount Mercy College graduates ($21,437 vs. $22,250).
• Among borrowers, WWU graduates have an estimated $9 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Mount Mercy College graduates ($221 vs. $230).
• More Mount Mercy College graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former WWU students, three years after graduation. (71% vs. 68%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.