Los Angeles College of Music vs. SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary

Comparable Facts

Compare Los Angeles College of Music in Pasadena, CA with SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary in El Dorado Hills, CA on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary is larger than Los Angeles College of Music based on total student enrollment (319 students vs. 261 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Los Angeles College of Music is located in Pasadena, CA (Midsize City setting); SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary is in El Dorado Hills, CA (Large City setting).
• Los Angeles College of Music is a private, for-profit 4-year institution. SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Los Angeles College of Music 3:1; SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary 18:1.

Los Angeles College of Music vs. SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Los Angeles College of Music or SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary than Los Angeles College of Music ($22,276 vs. $44,586).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary are 66.6% lower than at Los Angeles College of Music ($7,380 vs. $22,086).
• Los Angeles College of Music is 192% more expensive for in-state tuition than SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary (about $20,080 more per year; $30,540.00 vs. $10,460.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 192% higher at Los Angeles College of Music than at SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary (about $20,080 more per year; $30,540.00 vs. $10,460.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Los Angeles College of Music than at SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary (72% vs. 48%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Los Angeles College of Music students is 106.4% larger than aid received by SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary students ($5,532 vs. $2,680).

Los Angeles College of Music vs. SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Los Angeles College of Music or SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary and Los Angeles College of Music.

• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Los Angeles College of Music - Test-free; SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary - Test-free.
• Typical fall application deadline: SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary Aug 1, 2027.
• Los Angeles College of Music has a higher acceptance rate (87.7%) than SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary (40.7%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 18.1% at Los Angeles College of Music vs. 100% at SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary.

Los Angeles College of Music vs. SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Los Angeles College of Music and SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• More Los Angeles College of Music graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former SUM Bible College and Theological Seminary students, three years after graduation. (49% vs. 33%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.