FIDM LA vs. AIU Houston

Comparable Facts

Compare FIDM Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising in Los Angeles, CA with American InterContinental University Houston in Houston, TX on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

FIDM Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising is larger than AIU Houston based on total student enrollment (564 students vs. 116 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• FIDM Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising is located in Los Angeles, CA (Large City setting); American InterContinental University Houston is in Houston, TX (Large City setting).
• FIDM Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising is a private, for-profit 4-year institution. American InterContinental University Houston is a private, for-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: FIDM Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising 135:1; American InterContinental University Houston 13:1.

FIDM LA vs. AIU Houston Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, FIDM LA or AIU Houston? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at American InterContinental University Houston than FIDM LA ($18,792 vs. $39,494).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at American InterContinental University Houston are 59.1% lower than at FIDM Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising ($9,044 vs. $22,086).
• FIDM Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising is 136% more expensive for in-state tuition than AIU Houston (about $20,171 more per year; $35,000.00 vs. $14,829.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 136% higher at FIDM LA than at American InterContinental University Houston (about $20,171 more per year; $35,000.00 vs. $14,829.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at American InterContinental University Houston than at FIDM Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising (83% vs. 78%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by FIDM Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising students is 89.6% larger than aid received by American InterContinental University Houston students ($13,834 vs. $7,295).

FIDM LA vs. AIU Houston Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, FIDM LA or AIU Houston? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between AIU Houston and FIDM LA.

• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: FIDM LA - Not considered for admission, even if submitted (Test Blind); AIU Houston - not listed in this dataset.

FIDM LA vs. AIU Houston Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for FIDM LA and AIU Houston? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• FIDM Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising's six-year graduation rate (100%) is higher than American InterContinental University Houston's (14%).
• Graduates from American InterContinental University Houston earn a median of about $5,800 more per year than FIDM LA graduates about ten years after starting college ($47,400 vs. $41,600), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, FIDM Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising graduates have a $19,981 lower median loan debt than AIU Houston graduates ($13,000 vs. $32,981).
• Among borrowers, FIDM LA graduates have an estimated $207 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than AIU Houston graduates ($134 vs. $341).
• More FIDM LA graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former AIU Houston students, three years after graduation. (61% vs. 23%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.