Lehman vs. New England Tech

Comparable Facts

Compare CUNY Lehman College in Bronx, NY with New England Institute of Technology in East Greenwich, RI on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

CUNY Lehman College is larger than New England Tech based on total student enrollment (13,324 students vs. 1,922 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• CUNY Lehman College is located in Bronx, NY (Large City setting); New England Institute of Technology is in East Greenwich, RI (Small City setting).
• CUNY Lehman College is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. New England Institute of Technology is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: CUNY Lehman College 15:1; New England Institute of Technology 11:1.

Lehman vs. New England Tech Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, Lehman or New England Tech? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at CUNY Lehman College than New England Tech ($3,961 vs. $36,947).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at New England Institute of Technology are 22.4% lower than at CUNY Lehman College ($17,284 vs. $22,260).
• New England Institute of Technology is 403% more expensive for in-state tuition than Lehman (about $29,865 more per year; $37,275.00 vs. $7,410.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 142.7% higher at New England Tech than at CUNY Lehman College (about $21,915 more per year; $37,275.00 vs. $15,360.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at CUNY Lehman College than at New England Institute of Technology (94% vs. 90%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by New England Institute of Technology students is 14.2% larger than aid received by CUNY Lehman College students ($11,594 vs. $10,151).

Lehman vs. New England Tech Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, Lehman or New England Tech? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between New England Tech and Lehman.

• New England Institute of Technology reports an open admissions policy.
• The typical SAT score (median estimate) at New England Institute of Technology (1030) is 30 points higher than at Lehman (1000).
• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: CUNY Lehman College 850/1150; New England Institute of Technology 920/1140.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: Lehman - Test optional; New England Tech - Open admission.
• New England Tech has a higher acceptance rate (66.7%) than Lehman (56.6%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 12.2% at Lehman vs. 22.8% at New England Tech.

Lehman vs. New England Tech Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for Lehman and New England Tech? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Graduates from CUNY Lehman College earn a median of about $2,500 more per year than New England Tech graduates about ten years after starting college ($45,400 vs. $42,900), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, CUNY Lehman College graduates have a $9,800 lower median loan debt than New England Tech graduates ($10,200 vs. $20,000).
• Among borrowers, Lehman graduates have an estimated $101 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than New England Tech graduates ($105 vs. $206).
• More New England Tech graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former Lehman students, three years after graduation. (49% vs. 49%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.