ATU vs. WWU

Comparable Facts

Compare Arkansas Tech University in Russellville, AR with William Woods University in Fulton, MO on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Arkansas Tech University is larger than WWU based on total student enrollment (8,746 students vs. 2,046 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Arkansas Tech University is located in Russellville, AR (Remote Town setting); William Woods University is in Fulton, MO (Distant Town setting).
• Arkansas Tech University is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. William Woods University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Arkansas Tech University 17:1; William Woods University 16:1.

ATU vs. WWU Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, ATU or WWU? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Arkansas Tech University than WWU ($12,626 vs. $27,092).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Arkansas Tech University are 20.8% lower than at William Woods University ($10,338 vs. $13,050).
• William Woods University is 249.8% more expensive for in-state tuition than ATU (about $21,666 more per year; $30,340.00 vs. $8,674.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 106.8% higher at WWU than at Arkansas Tech University (about $15,672 more per year; $30,340.00 vs. $14,668.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at William Woods University than at Arkansas Tech University (99% vs. 93%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by William Woods University students is 124.3% larger than aid received by Arkansas Tech University students ($22,204 vs. $9,901).

ATU vs. WWU Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, ATU or WWU? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between WWU and ATU.

• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 880/1100.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 17/23.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: ATU - Required; WWU - Test optional.
• Typical fall application deadline: WWU Dec 1, 2026.
• Accepted freshman WWU students have a 0.03 point higher average high school GPA (3.4) than students at ATU (3.37).
• ATU has a higher acceptance rate (95.9%) than WWU (71%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 33.6% at ATU vs. 23.6% at WWU.

ATU vs. WWU Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for ATU and WWU? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• William Woods University's six-year graduation rate (50%) is higher than Arkansas Tech University's (43%).
• Graduates from William Woods University earn a median of about $1,500 more per year than ATU graduates about ten years after starting college ($38,600 vs. $37,100), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Arkansas Tech University graduates have a $3,687 lower median loan debt than WWU graduates ($17,750 vs. $21,437).
• Among borrowers, ATU graduates have an estimated $38 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than WWU graduates ($183 vs. $221).
• More WWU graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former ATU students, three years after graduation. (68% vs. 51%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.