ATU vs. Kansas Wesleyan University

Comparable Facts

Compare Arkansas Tech University in Russellville, AR with Kansas Wesleyan University in Salina, KS on tuition, admissions, graduation, earnings, and student body data using the table above.

Arkansas Tech University is larger than Kansas Wesleyan University based on total student enrollment (8,746 students vs. 1,021 students)

Location, institution type, and student-faculty ratio

• Arkansas Tech University is located in Russellville, AR (Remote Town setting); Kansas Wesleyan University is in Salina, KS (Remote Town setting).
• Arkansas Tech University is a public, non-profit 4-year institution. Kansas Wesleyan University is a private, non-profit 4-year institution.
• Student-to-faculty ratio: Arkansas Tech University 17:1; Kansas Wesleyan University 16:1.

ATU vs. Kansas Wesleyan University Cost Comparison

Which college is more expensive, ATU or Kansas Wesleyan University? Published tuition is the sticker price; many students pay less after aid (see average net price below).

• The typical actual cost that students pay to attend (average net price) is less at Arkansas Tech University than Kansas Wesleyan University ($12,626 vs. $22,930).
• Living costs (room and board or off-campus housing budget) at Arkansas Tech University are 12.7% lower than at Kansas Wesleyan University ($10,338 vs. $11,840).
• Kansas Wesleyan University is 299.2% more expensive for in-state tuition than ATU (about $25,956 more per year; $34,630.00 vs. $8,674.00).
• Out-of-state tuition is 136.1% higher at Kansas Wesleyan University than at Arkansas Tech University (about $19,962 more per year; $34,630.00 vs. $14,668.00).
• A larger share of students receive grant aid at Kansas Wesleyan University than at Arkansas Tech University (100% vs. 93%).
• The average total grant financial aid received by Kansas Wesleyan University students is 148.1% larger than aid received by Arkansas Tech University students ($24,560 vs. $9,901).

ATU vs. Kansas Wesleyan University Admissions comparison

Which college is harder to get into, ATU or Kansas Wesleyan University? Typical SAT and ACT scores (same estimates as in the table above), middle 50% test ranges where reported, test score submission policy, deadlines, and acceptance rates summarize admission difficulty between Kansas Wesleyan University and ATU.

• Reported middle 50% SAT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 880/1100.
• Reported middle 50% ACT composite range (25th-75th percentile) for admitted students: Arkansas Tech University 17/23.
• Submitting SAT or ACT scores: ATU - Required; Kansas Wesleyan University - Test-free.
• Accepted freshman ATU students have a 0.03 point higher average high school GPA (3.37) than students at Kansas Wesleyan University (3.34).
• ATU has a higher acceptance rate (95.9%) than Kansas Wesleyan University (71.9%).
• The share of admitted students who enrolled (yield) is 33.6% at ATU vs. 18.6% at Kansas Wesleyan University.

ATU vs. Kansas Wesleyan University Graduation Outcomes Comparison

How do outcomes compare for ATU and Kansas Wesleyan University? Graduation rate, earnings, and student loan debt are common indicators. The bullets below summarize the same federal outcomes fields as the comparison table (College Scorecard / IPEDS where applicable).

• Arkansas Tech University's six-year graduation rate (43%) is higher than Kansas Wesleyan University's (42%).
• Graduates from Kansas Wesleyan University earn a median of about $5,400 more per year than ATU graduates about ten years after starting college ($42,500 vs. $37,100), per the same Scorecard earnings definition.
• Among federal student loan borrowers, Arkansas Tech University graduates have a $7,075 lower median loan debt than Kansas Wesleyan University graduates ($17,750 vs. $24,825).
• Among borrowers, ATU graduates have an estimated $73 lower median monthly federal student loan payment than Kansas Wesleyan University graduates ($183 vs. $256).
• More Kansas Wesleyan University graduates are actively paying back their federal student loan debt than former ATU students, three years after graduation. (57% vs. 51%)

Sources: U.S. Department of Education https://nces.ed.gov IPEDS and College Scorecard https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/. Values reflect the most recent year available in our dataset.